The UK Government’s (lack of) position on the execution of Brexit would be laughable, were it not so crushingly destructive to almost every aspect of life in the UK. The word itself is often prefixed with vague and misleading qualifiers, that only serve to further baffle and confuse observers. ‘Hard Brexit’, ‘Soft Brexit’ or even a ‘Red, White and Blue Brexit’.

@everybrexitbot produces tweets of the form “[adjective] brexit”, alphabetically from a list of 1346 adjectives.

Obviously, a computer could produce all the possible combinations in a fraction of a second, but that’s not really the point. By releasing them sequentially, there’s a sense of anticipation about what kind of brexit might be coming next.

Not entirely unlike the current state of affairs within the Conservative Party.

The ‘every word’ format twitter bot has been around for a while, with @everyword by Allison Parrish being the most notable.

Twitter lends itself to these forms, dropping in algo-phrases every few hours, some of which prompt a smile. More frequently they drift past, flotsam in the constantly spewing stream of social media ephemera.

Here’s a little Deep Fried Theresa May.

The Brexorcist

As part of my ongoing collaboration with The Fortunecats, we produced a show for the 2017 Brighton Fringe Festival called ‘The Brexorcist’.

‘The Brexorcist’ – A Darkly Satirical Musical Catharsis

Nominated for Best Live Music at Brighton Fringe Awards 2017

Involving: The Private Sector, Seth Morgan, Frank France, Jason Pegg, Tim Harbridge, Sarah Gardner and the Dulcetones, Glen Richardson, Dave Suit, Graham Darg, Tim Leopard, Simon Adams and Chris Hope. Makeup Design by Deborah Turnbull and Julia Monkcom. Filming by Nick Driftwood. Visuals by Eric Drass. Directed by Sam Hewitt.


These animated portraits are made of files.

Donald Trump

Steve Bannon

The individual frames are of a far higher resolution than you see here. Click the image below to see one full size.



It hardly needs saying, but we live in strange, unpresidented (sic) times. The President Elect of the United States of America, Donald John Trump, is an extraordinary individual, in every sense of the word.

One of his most notable attributes is his addiction to Twitter.

Seemingly without thought or consideration, he delivers bite-sized slices of wisdom whenever he deems fit. Whilst one may argue that this is precisely the modus operandi of the Twitter service, it seems ill-fitting of a man who is soon to command the most powerful country in the world.

Diplomacy is hard. Indeed, his twitter feed has already led to increased tensions between China and Taiwan, and he’s yet to enter office.

Since Mr Trump chooses to tweet, it seems worthwhile to investigate what else he’s revealing along the way.


This bot parses Donald’s tweets, and performs a sentiment analysis to find out his mood. Generally speaking, this form of analysis is best used for larger volumes of text, and tends to be a bit hit and miss on a 140 character tweet. However, Mr Trump uses English at the level of an eleven year old child, which makes things easier.

This sentiment score is turned into an emoji, indicating his mood.

In addition, the bot examines the meta-data of the tweet and assesses the likelihood that it was authored by the man himself, or sent by a member of his team. It is generally accepted that Trump tweets from an Android device, while his team tend to use iPhones. Indeed, at least one member of his staff posts the geo-coordinates along with the tweet, allowing me to neatly create a map of where the tweet originated.


Fake News and Feelings

The term ‘fake news’ is applied to all forms of information, true or false, depending on political agendas. We are said to be living in a Post-Truth age. As Newt explains below, truth no longer matters, it’s all about how people ‘feel’

This bot does not try to understand the words of Mr Trump (a challenge for many), instead it mathematically analyses his tweets and presents the data in a deliberately vague and emotive manner.

After all, people don’t want facts, they just want feelings.


The Overton window, also known as the window of discourse, is the range of ideas the public will accept.

The ‘fitness’ of a political idea is dependent on the mood of the population. However, political ideas are rarely presented in an unbiased manner. Stories are spun and sensationalised, dependent on the political leanings of the media owner. The Daily Mail contains stories that would never be printed in The Guardian, and vice versa.

Political ideas can be made more palatable if the prevailing narrative of the media outlet supports them. For example, stories about ‘benefit cheats’ and ‘welfare queens’ support the notion of curtailing welfare budgets without ever explicitly mentioning Government policy.

As more extreme views get discussed, the Overton window shifts, and previously unthinkable ideas become normalised and accepted. In many ways, the media influence the Overton window even more than politicians.


Play School was BBC children’s programme which ran from 1964 to 1988. Part of the show featured a section where the audience were invited to look through the window at a scene filmed outside the studio. Often a factory or a domestic scene. A literal invitation for children to explore the world of adults.

It struck me that the Play School window could offer a glimpse of what’s through the conceptual Overton window.